Once you’ve completed your research, you’ll need to prepare your thesis for submission and examination.
Submitting your thesis for examination
You can submit your thesis for examination at any time during the year. You must submit your Intention to Submit form two months before your intended submission date. The date on which the thesis documents and nomination of examiners are received by GRS is the date recorded as the official thesis submission date.
Along with other information about your candidature, this form will ask you to provide information regarding any research internships you may have undertaken during your candidature. A research internship can be either paid or unpaid, and can form part of enrolment or be undertaken during an HDR period of suspension. Your internship may have been arranged by UTS, your supervisor, a third-party provider, or you may have arranged it yourself. If you signed an agreement, contract, or other internship project proposal, you will be asked to upload a copy of this document.
You must submit your digital thesis and accompanying documents to the faculty research administration office. If your thesis examiners request hard copies, you will need to supply them.
Your thesis must include a certificate of original authorship, student statement and supervisor certificate stating that the work is ready for examination. This is now an online process, please go to our Policies, guidelines and forms page for more information and checklists to help you with your submission.
Thesis requirements
Based on the type of thesis you submit and the degree you’re studying, your thesis will need to meet a range of designated requirements that govern:
- word length
- printing
- language of the thesis
- formatting
- order of contents
- title page
- certificate of original authorship, including RTP statement
- page numbering
- thesis abstract
- appendices
- large diagrams, charts and tables
- referencing.
Your thesis must also include or acknowledge any published or publishable work you develop during your candidature.
Including COVID-19 impacts in your thesis
UTS recognises that many graduate research students’ research projects have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, some projects have been repositioned by modifying or changing methodologies, project scope, number of experiments, number or type of participants, etc. Every student’s project is different and, as such, the extent and the specifics of the impact is different.
Students whose research has been impacted by restrictions related to the pandemic are encouraged to consult with their supervisory panel about how best to reflect these impacts in their thesis, and if in fact, it is relevant to do so.
Some approaches to reflect the impact of COVID-19 in theses may be:
- A brief statement included in the front matter of the thesis which provides a summary of COVID-19 impacts on the research.
- Detailed statement(s) of COVID-19 impact in the:
a. Introduction chapter or sections to position the scope of the project.
b. Methods chapter or sections of the thesis to clearly describe, explain and justify the shifts in methodology. This may include highlighting unintended but resulting innovations in methodology.
c. Discussion and/or Conclusions chapters or sections to indicate future research directions such as when originally planned approaches can again be undertaken; insights about implications of the work in continuing or post-pandemic contexts.
Using a professional editor or proofreader
You can use the services of a professional editor or proofreader to help prepare your thesis for submission. These professionals can provide copyediting and proofreading advice; however, they cannot shape or change the substance or structure of your work.
It’s important to make sure you understand the rules around using an editor or proofreader before you engage a professional. As a starting point, you should read the following documents:
You should also request permission from your supervisor before you engage an editor or proofreader.
iThenticate access
UTS provides access for staff and students to a plagiarism detection program called iThenticate. It is important to remember that plagiarism is not always intentional, so making use of this tool can provide peace of mind.
To access iThenticate, you will need to log a request via ServiceConnect using your student login credentials and follow these steps:
- follow this link to the ServiceConnect home page
- select 'Requests'
- select 'user account, system and file access' from the left-hand list of options
- select iThenticate access
- complete the online form and submit, you will receive an email with access information once your request has been assessed and approved. If you have any questions relating to your request or access, please contact the IT Support Centre via ServiceConnect or by phone on 9514 2222.
Nominating thesis examiners
You should start discussing potential examiners with your supervisory panel at least two months prior to the date you intend to submit your thesis. A minimum of four potential examiners must be identified and any conflicts of interest considered. This list should be ready, along with your Intention to Submit form.
Once the potential list of examiners has been agreed upon, you need to complete your part of the Nomination of Examiners form.
The examination process will be confidential and you will not know who the final examination panel will include.
Your principal supervisor and your faculty RAO will then nominate your thesis examiners to the Graduate Research School before you submit your thesis. The Dean of the Graduate Research School is responsible for approving and appointing the examiners.
Examiners must have relevant expertise in your field of endeavour, with no existing or potential conflict of interest. A minimum of 2 and maximum of 3 examiners are required for PhD theses. 2 examiners are required for masters by research theses. All examiners must be external to UTS.
If you have concerns about your thesis being examined by a particular person, you should raise these concerns with your supervisor for consideration during the examiner nomination process.
Conflict of interest
To ensure the examination process remains impartial, examiners must not have the potential for real or perceived conflict of interest, as outlined in the Australian Council of Graduate Research ACGR Conflict of Interest in Examination Guidelines and the Nomination of Examiners (FAQ).
People who might be perceived to have a conflict of interest with a student include, but are not limited to:
- someone who has a working relationship with the student (e.g. if the examiner has acted as a referee for the student to gain employment)
- current or former colleagues or friends (e.g. if the examiner is a friend, associate or mentor of the student)
- family members (including family by law, e.g. if the examiner is stepfather, sister-in-law, etc, to the student)
- other professional or social relationship (e.g. if the examiner has had personal contact with the student that may give rise to the perception that the examiner may be dealing with the student in a less than objective manner).
Thesis examination process
Once all of the requirements for your examination have been met and confirmed by your faculty research administration office, the Graduate Research School (GRS) will change your enrolment status to ‘under examination’ and copies of your thesis will be sent to the nominated examiners. The thesis examination process can take 3-6 months to complete.
Under examination: please note, this status effectively 'stops the clock' on your candidature.
Once your examiners have returned their reports to the Graduate Research School, they will be collated and forwarded to your faculty Responsible Academic Officer (RAO). Depending on the outcome, the RAO will either release the results to you and your principal supervisor or consult with your supervisory panel and make a recommendation, which will go before the Faculty Research Degree Committee (FRDC).
After reviewing, the FRDC will make a final recommendation, or defer to the Thesis Examination Committee (TEC) as required.
For further information, please refer to the Graduate Research Final Examination Procedures which outlines responsibilities and expectations for managing the range of options of examiner reports, reconciling disparate reports, moderation and re-examination.
Please note that the examination process remains confidential until a resolution is reached by either the TEC or the FRDC.
Possible examination recommendations
(for thesis examination forms created before 31 Dec 2023)
There are 6 possible recommendations (see corresponding Procedures):
Recommendation 1
That the candidate be admitted to the degree, subject to the correction of typographic errors without any amendments.
Recommendation 2
That the candidate be admitted to the degree subject to the correction of any nominated minor clarifications and textual amendments to the satisfaction of the Responsible Academic Officer.
Recommendation 3
That the candidate be admitted to the degree subject to specific criticisms of the thesis as recommended by the examiners being addressed to the satisfaction of the Responsible Academic Officer, and any rewriting not changing the substantive conclusions of the thesis.
Recommendation 4
That the candidate be not admitted to the degree but be permitted to re-submit the thesis in a revised form for re-examination following a period of further study.
Recommendation 5
- PhD students: That the candidate be invited to revise and resubmit the thesis for a research masters degree.
- Research masters students: That the candidate not be awarded the degree and not be permitted to resubmit.Recommendation 6
That the PhD candidate not be awarded the degree and not be permitted to resubmit.
Possible examination recommendations
(for thesis examination forms created from 01 January 2024)
Possible recommendations for both masters by research and doctoral degrees are (see corresponding Procedures):
- Pass - No amendments to content required; or only amendments involving typographical errors, formatting issues or other edits that have no bearing on the intellectual quality of the overall thesis. The RAO verifies the edits have been addressed.
- Pass with amendments - Amendments to content are required. In this case, Examiners must provide a list and explanation of each required revision. The student must address the examiners’ criticisms to the satisfaction of the RAO. These revisions will be reviewed and verified by the RAO in consultation with the supervisory panel.
- Resubmission and re-examination – Substantial and/or considerable changes to the content of the thesis are required but can be resolved with major revision. Examiners must provide a list and explanation of the required changes. Based on the examiner recommendation on the revised thesis, the RAO in consultation with the supervisory panel, makes a recommendation to the TEC. A resubmitted thesis may only be awarded a result of 1, 2 or 4*.
- Fail - The thesis has serious irredeemable flaws and is not of a standard to be awarded the degree.
Depending on the recommendation you receive, you may be notified that you can submit your final thesis for graduation, or you may need to continue working on your thesis and resubmit it at a later date. In rare cases, you may not have the option to resubmit.
If you are required to revise your thesis, you must complete the Thesis Revision Response template to accompany your resubmitted work. All actions should be completed within the timeframes specified in the Graduate Research Final Examination Procedures and the UTS Student Rules (11.20).
Thesis examination committees
Thesis examination committee
The TEC, acting for the Higher Degree Research Board, establishes and oversees the thesis examination process. This includes (but not limited to):
- setting the examination criteria and reporting requirements
- setting the requirements for faculties to make recommendations related to examination outcomes
- consideration of examination outcomes, including consideration to UTS Student Rules 11.20.5 to 11.20.7
- setting re-examination procedures
- recommending to admit/not to admit candidates to degrees
- communication between the TEC and faculties is facilitated by the GRS
2025 TEC meeting dates:
- Thurs 20 Feb (papers due to GRS Mon 10 Feb)
- Thurs 20 Mar (papers due to GRS Mon 10 Mar)
- Thurs 17 Apr (papers due to GRS Mon 07 Apr)
- Thurs 15 May (papers due to GRS Mon 05 May)
- Thurs 19 Jun (papers due to GRS Mon 09 Jun)
- Thurs 17 Jul (papers due to GRS Mon 07 Jul)
- Thurs 21 Aug (papers due to GRS Mon 11 Aug)
- Thurs 18 Sep (papers due to GRS Mon 08 Sep)
- Thurs 16 Oct (papers due to GRS Tues 07 Oct)
- Thurs 20 Nov (papers due to GRS Mon 10 Nov)
- Thurs 11 Dec (papers due to GRS Mon 01 Dec)
Faculty Research Degree Committees
The FRDCs are responsible for considering/approving the recommendation of the RAO for examination outcomes.
Large faculties may establish school-level examination committees, which report to the FRDC. Responsibilities will include considering/approving the recommendation of the RAO for examination outcomes and communicating the outcome to the supervisory panel and graduate research student.
Please contact your faculty research office for further information, including meeting dates.
Preparing for completion
Once you’ve been notified that you can submit your final thesis for conferral, you’ll need to supply the following documents to your faculty:
- your thesis abstract
- a digital copy of your thesis and confirmation of digital submission to the library
- a completed thesis revision response
- a final bound copy of your thesis (if required by your faculty).
After you’ve received a recommendation from your faculty, the Dean of the Graduate Research School (GRS) will recommend to the Academic Board that you be admitted to the degree.
Please contact your faculty research office for their submission deadline for each conferral.
2025 conferral dates and deadlines
Conferral dates, and faculty to GRS submission deadlines:
- February Conferral — 12 February 2025
Faculty to GRS deadline — 17 January 2025 - March Conferral — 19 March 2025
Faculty to GRS deadline — 21 February 2025 - May Conferral — 28 May 2025
Faculty to GRS deadline — 2 May 2025 - July Conferral — 23 July 2025
Faculty to GRS deadline — 27 June 2025 - September Conferral — 3 September 2025
Faculty to GRS deadline — 8 August 2025 - November Conferral — 26 November 2025
Faculty to GRS deadline — 31 October 2025
Reimbursement of thesis costs
If you are a research scholarship holder and you have spent money on thesis editing and/or printing costs, you may be eligible for reimbursement.
Reimbursement information is contained in the Conditions of Award (CoA) for your scholarship—if your CoA contains a Thesis Allowance section, you can apply for reimbursement within 12 months of your thesis submission date. To apply for reimbursement, please fill out the Scholarship Allowance Claim Form and attach original tax invoices as evidence of your expenditure.