Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy
On this page
Purpose | Scope | Principles | Policy statements | Roles and responsibilities | Definitions | Approval information | Version history | References
1. Purpose
1.1 The Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy (the policy) outlines the university’s commitment to the prevention of fraudulent, corrupt, unlawful, negligent or improper conduct at UTS.
1.2 This policy:
- forms part of the university’s wider commitment to a culture of integrity (refer Conduct, behaviour and integrity at Policy by classification)
- works alongside the Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy, which supports the implementation of the university’s obligations under the Public Interest Disclosures Act 2022 (NSW) (PID Act).
2. Scope
2.1 This policy applies to UTS staff, students and affiliates, and staff and affiliates of UTS controlled and associated entities (hereafter staff).
3. Principles
3.1 Honesty and integrity are core values at UTS. High ethical standards and conduct are expected at all times.
3.2 This policy, along with the Equity, Inclusion and Respect Policy, the Code of Conduct and the Student Rights and Responsibilities Policy, supports UTS to:
- uphold UTS values and foster a culture of integrity
- prevent serious wrongdoing
- identify and detect serious wrongdoing, and
- continually improve fraud and corruption prevention and response strategies.
4. Policy statements
Culture, behaviour and staff responsibility
4.1 UTS takes a zero tolerance approach to fraud, corruption and serious wrongdoing. Staff must not engage in, participate in, cover up or fail to report:
- any fraudulent activity, corrupt conduct, serious maladministration or serious or substantial waste of public money, or government information contravention (hereafter serious wrongdoing)
- victimisation, bullying, harassment or any other form of reprisal against another person for reporting or intending to report serious wrongdoing or about whom a report or disclosure has been made (refer the Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy and the Equity, Inclusion and Respect Policy).
4.2 The UTS Council and the University Leadership Team are responsible for the following fraud and corruption prevention strategies:
- annual management signoffs
- annual internal audits
- a clear understanding of relevant risks, legal obligations, compliance requirements and behavioural expectations
- a commitment to, and role modelling of, ethical conduct
- compliance with Schedule G1 – Delegations Principles when exercising a delegated function (refer Delegations), and
- ensuring supervisors and senior leaders in each division have individual workplans that address the fraud and corruption control mechanisms listed in this policy.
4.3 Supervisors play a particularly important role in:
- role modelling UTS’s behavioural expectations
- educating staff about the requirements of this policy, the Conflicts of Interest Disclosure Policy and the Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy
- ensuring staff are aware of their responsibility to behave ethically and to comply with legal obligations and all conduct, behaviour and integrity policies (refer Conduct, behaviour and integrity at Policy by classification) and Schedule G1 – Delegations Principles
- promoting ethical behaviour and a speak up culture in their division, unit and/or team (refer Speak up at UTS)
- encouraging members of the UTS community to report serious wrongdoing
- raising awareness of fraud and corruption risks among staff through onboarding and induction activities, staff development team meetings and the workplanning process (refer Workplanning and review (Staff Connect)), and
- managing serious wrongdoing and any fraud and corruption risks faced by UTS by acting consistently with their responsibilities and receiving public interest disclosures (refer Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy).
4.4 Staff must, as part of their workplanning process:
- familiarise themselves with the conduct, behaviour and integrity policies (refer Conduct, behaviour and integrity at Policy by classification), requesting additional information from their supervisor where necessary
- discuss conflicts of interest with their supervisor and disclose any conflicts of interest in line with the Conflicts of Interest Disclosure Policy
- discuss foreign interference risks and foreign bribery risks with their supervisors where there are any interactions with international partners, institutions, consultants or other third parties, and
- agree to act in line with Schedule G1 – Delegations Principles when executing a delegated authority.
4.5 Where a third party is contracted to undertake work for, or on behalf of, UTS it is a requirement that:
- all necessary due diligence is undertaken before any formal engagement with the third party
- third parties are provided with, and must abide by, all conduct, behaviour and integrity policies (refer Conduct, behaviour and integrity at Policy by classification), and
- third parties are made aware of this policy and the Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy.
4.6 Members of Council and committees of Council must act in accordance with the required terms of reference and the Governance Overview Handbook (available at UTS Council: Governance).
Fraud and corruption awareness
4.7 Fraud and corruption awareness is provided as part of UTS’s onboarding program (refer Welcome to UTS (Staff Connect)). Targeted training is provided to identified staff as part of the workplanning process (refer Workplanning and review (Staff Connect)).
4.8 Awareness and training programs must be available to:
- ensure continued awareness of fraud and corruption related risks, including foreign bribery
- enable supervisors to understand corruption risks, identify vulnerabilities and identify prevention strategies
- enable staff to identify serious wrongdoing or ‘red flags’ that may indicate serious wrongdoing
- provide clear guidance on how to report fraud and corruption in line with the Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy, and
- reinforce fraud and corruption control activities (refer Risk assessments and fraud and corruption prevention plans).
4.9 As part of the recruitment process, positions with specific responsibilities for fraud and corruption control, compliance or in an identified risk area (refer Risk areas for serious wrongdoing) must:
- have relevant training requirements included in the position description (informed by the relevant fraud and corruption prevention plan), and
- include an appropriate due diligence (or pre-screening) process in line with the Recruitment and Appointment Policy.
Risk areas for serious wrongdoing
4.10 Supervisors must ensure that appropriate fraud and corruption prevention training is available for staff undertaking the activities listed in table 4.10, which have been identified as having a risk of fraud, corruption or serious wrongdoing (refer Definitions).
Table 4.10: High risk activities for fraud, corruption or serious wrongdoing
Activity | Examples of possible serious wrongdoing |
---|---|
Decision-making and authorisations | Examples include:
|
International activities | Examples include:
|
Records, information, data and knowledge use or management | This includes intellectual property, research data, staff and student records, corporate data, governance and commercial in confidence information. Examples include:
|
Financial management | This includes revenue and expenditure, procurement processes, payroll, grants management, tenders, investments, accounting activities, expenses and use of the corporate credit card. Examples include:
|
Asset and facilities management | This includes IT facilities, lab and physical campuses. Examples include:
|
Risk assessments and fraud and corruption prevention plans
4.11 UTS maintains and implements internal control systems to manage fraud and corruption and may develop new controls in response to fraud and corruption risk assessments.
4.12 The Director, Risk is responsible for providing advice regarding:
- appropriate insurance and safeguards to protect against the risk of wrongdoing
- the development of prevention plans and associated risk assessments and proposed action plans
- the development of disclosure protection plans as outlined in the Public Interest Disclosures Management Procedure, and
- working with the Head, Compliance and Assurance, addressing gaps in risk management and compliance identified as part of the management of a public interest disclosure (refer Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy).
4.13 Deans and directors (or equivalent, hereafter directors) are responsible for developing fraud and corruption prevention plans in Risk Connect that adequately address risks in their area of responsibility. These prevention plans must include:
- a fraud and corruption risk assessment for all relevant activities (including assessment of the Risk areas for serious wrongdoing), and
- an action plan to mitigate and manage identified risks.
4.14 Fraud and corruption risk assessments are conducted using Risk Connect. Vulnerabilities that should be considered in a fraud and corruption risk assessment are provided in the templates in Risk Connect. The outcome of the risk assessment will be the development of an action plan. Refer Risk Management Policy and Risk Management Procedure (SharePoint).
4.15 Directors must review prevention plans annually to ensure they remain current and deal effectively with new or emerging risks. Prevention plans must be reported to the relevant member of the University Leadership Team by 31 October each year (or as otherwise directed by the Director, Risk).
4.16 Fraud and corruption prevention plans are reviewed in a manner determined by the General Counsel and Executive Director, Risk and Compliance.
4.17 The Audit and Risk Committee may require action, amendment or improvement to this policy or the fraud and corruption control framework to ensure the university’s legislative requirements and obligations prescribed by the Audit Office of New South Wales are met.
Identifying and reporting serious wrongdoing
4.18 Detection of serious wrongdoing may occur through observing fraudulent or corrupt activities or by discovering information that tends to reveal fraud or corruption.
4.19 This detection process can occur through any of the following activities:
- Continuous monitoring and data analytics: UTS's information systems, including the use of software applications and computer-assisted audit capabilities, may provide an important source of information on serious wrongdoing (for example, by identifying suspect transactions)
- Internal and external reporting channels: including through the NSW Ombudsman, the Independent Commission Against Corruption and/or via the Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy, the Conflicts of Interest Disclosure Policy, the Gifts and Benefits Policy, the Outside Work Policy, the Staff Complaints Policy and any other reports of non-compliance with the university’s legislative compliance obligations.
- Internal audit program: Fraud and corruption risk assessments are used to inform the development of UTS's annual program of internal audits.
- External audit: UTS management and the Audit and Risk Committee maintain a professional relationship with the Audit Office of New South Wales (AONSW), providing the opportunity to attend Audit and Risk Committee meetings, access to minutes of all committee meetings and addressing any AONSW requirements. UTS supports the AONSW to assist in fraud detection and response.
4.20 Public officials (including staff and affiliates) must report serious wrongdoing in line with the Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy. Any other person may report serious wrongdoing committed by the university, its staff, students or affiliates (refer Speak up at UTS for reporting options).
4.21 Information on how to report and manage public interest disclosures is outlined in the Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy and at Whistleblowing. Fraud and corruption risk management processes, reporting processes and response mechanisms will be reviewed in response to outcomes of an investigation as part of a continuous improvement process.
Records management
4.22 Information relating to fraud and corruption controls, including fraud and corruption prevention plans, must be managed in line with the Records Management Policy and the Data Governance Policy.
4.23 Information relating to the reporting of serious wrongdoing must be managed in line with the Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy.
Policy breaches
4.24 Breaches of this policy will be managed in line with the Code of Conduct, the Enterprise agreements and/or the Student Rights and Responsibilities Policy as appropriate.
4.25 Breaches of this policy that relate to acts of fraud or corruption will be managed in line with the Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy and the relevant Enterprise agreements.
5. Roles and responsibilities
5.1 Policy owner: The General Counsel and Executive Director, Risk and Compliance is responsible for:
- policy enforcement and compliance, ensuring that its principles and statements are observed
- reporting to the Audit and Risk Committee as required on fraud and corruption management activities
- reviewing this policy every 2 years in line with the Audit Office of New South Wales requirements, and
- the approval of any associated training and university level procedures.
5.2 Policy contact: The Director, Risk is responsible for:
- the day-to-day implementation of this policy, acting as the primary point of contact for advice
- advising on training requirements, and
- ensuring alignment with the Risk Management Policy as part of an integrated approach to the management of the university’s fraud risk profile.
5.3 Implementation and governance roles: Council, with the guidance and support of the Audit and Risk Committee, is responsible for oversight and monitoring of fraud and corruption risk management, including the implementation of this policy and assisting in its review.
The University Leadership Team, directors and supervisors are required to:
- understand fraud and corruption risks at UTS
- adopt a risk-based approach in their management, undertake fraud and corruption risk assessments and maintain fraud and corruption prevention plans
- lead by example in their behaviour in the workplace
- create and sustain a speak up culture, and
- report and/or manage reports of serious wrongdoing in line with the Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy.
Performance and commitment in these areas will form part of the performance review process for supervisors at UTS.
All staff, students and affiliates are responsible for ensuring the integrity of the university’s management and administrative practices, including by reporting serious wrongdoing.
6. Definitions
The following definitions apply for this policy and all associated procedures. Other definitions are available in the Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy. Definitions in the singular also include the plural meaning of the word.
Affiliate is defined in the Code of Conduct.
Foreign bribery means the bribery of a foreign public official as outlined in division 70 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cwlth). Foreign bribery is corrupt conduct, a form of serious wrongdoing.
Foreign interference means any activity carried out by, or on behalf of, a foreign actor that goes beyond the routine diplomatic influence practised by governments and is:
- coercive, corrupting, deceptive and clandestine, and
- contrary to Australia’s sovereignty, values and national interests.
Integrity is defined in the Equity, Inclusion and Respect Policy.
Internal control system means systems of control, including policies, procedures, delegations, processes or systems established in order to provide reasonable assurance of:
- effective and efficient operations
- internal financial control, and
- compliance with laws and regulations.
Serious wrongdoing (also wrongdoing) is defined in the Public Interest Disclosures Act 2022 (NSW) and summarised in the Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy.
Staff is defined in the Code of Conduct.
Supervisor is defined in the Code of Conduct.
Approval information
Policy contact | Director, Risk |
---|---|
Approval authority | Council |
Review date | 2025 (every 2 years) |
File number | UR23/1137 |
Superseded documents | Fraud and Corruption Prevention and Public Interest Disclosures Policy and Procedures (UR09/417) |
Version history
Version | Approved by | Approval date | Effective date | Sections modified |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 | Council (COU/23-4/82) | 16/08/2023 | 30/09/2023 | New policy. |
1.1 | Director, Governance Support Unit (Delegation 3.14.1) | 31/10/2024 | 07/11/2024 | Updates to reflect new foreign bribery offences in the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cwlth). Update of policy title. |
References
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure Policy
Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cwlth)
Equity, Inclusion and Respect Policy
Public Interest Disclosures Management Procedure
Recruitment and Appointment Policy
Schedule G1 – Delegations Principles
Student Rights and Responsibilities Policy
Welcome to UTS (Staff Connect)
Workplanning and review (Staff Connect)
Whistleblowing and Public Interest Disclosures Policy
Acknowledgements
Audit Office of New South Wales