Redaktion93 / Shutterstock
Ethan Pooley, undergraduate student, Social and Political Sciences and Chinese Language and Culture, University of Technology Sydney |
James Laurenceson, Director, Australia-China Relations Institute, University of Technology Sydney |
To read the full paper please download the PDF
Download
Key takeaways
- Diplomatic engagement provides a means for government ministers and officials to press Australia’s interests. It is widely appreciated that part of the fallout from political tensions between Canberra and Beijing has been fewer opportunities for diplomatic interactions with counterparts in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). However, the extent to which this has occurred and whether Australia is or isn’t an outlier in this respect has not been systematically studied.
- This brief presents evidence that over the period January 2016 to August 2021 Australia had fewer diplomatic interactions with the PRC than 10 other countries that Canberra cites as being ‘like-minded’ or partners of regional significance. While not an outlier in 2016, by 2020 Australia was the singular exception in having zero interactions. The paucity of Australian diplomatic interactions applied irrespective of the seniority level of PRC counterpart.
- The state of diplomatic engagement is not the be all and end all of the bilateral relationship. Much valuable engagement continues in the business, arts and culture and people-to-people realms. Nonetheless, diplomatic estrangement brings costs and what is clear is that Australia cannot draw comfort from peers finding themselves in the same predicament. This fact might prompt reflection in Canberra on whether lessons can be drawn from how these peers manage their own relations with Beijing.
Authors
Ethan Pooley, undergraduate student, Social and Political Sciences and Chinese Language and Culture, University of Technology Sydney
Professor James Laurenceson, Director, Australia-China Relations Institute, University of Technology Sydney